Legal Opinion

Proctor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 28, 1918No. A-2331PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Cecil Proctor was convicted of keeping a place with intent and for the purpose of unlawfully selling, bartering, and giving away intoxicating liquors, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

GALBRAITH, Special Judge.’

The plaintiff in error was charged by information filed in the district court of Oklahoma county, tried and convicted of “keeping a place, to wit, a two-story brick building, with the intent and for the purpose of unlawfully selling, bartering, and giving away spirituous, vinous, fermented and malt liquors,” etc.

To the iñformation a demurrer was interposed upon the ground that the information fails to charge a public offense under any law of the state of Oklahoma, and that section 4 of chapter 26, Session Laws of Oklahoma 1913, on which said informtion is based, is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Howell v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. State v. PainterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. BurgessWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. HesselWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. State v. CarusoNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1942
  5. Lambert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API