Central School District No. 1 v. Litz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichard D. Simons, J.
Petitioner moves for a stay of arbitration.
*1010A contract executed by petitioner and respondents on June 5, 1969 provided for various terms and conditions of employment. In dispute is the provision for “ teacher load ”. It states that “ in order to promote an optimum learning and teaching environment, the Board of Education shall make every effort to maintain the 1968-1969 teacher specialist-pupil ratio.” For the fiscal year 1969-1970, the teacher specialist-pupil ratio was increased by the elimination of dental hygienists and by the reduction of the number of nurse teachers, both of whom come…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Education v. Chautauqua Central School Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Board of Education v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Ladany v. William Morrow & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- In re Arbitration between the Board of Education & Auburn TeachersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Belmont Central School District v. Belmont Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.