Legal Opinion

Central School District No. 1 v. Litz

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichard D. Simons, J.

Petitioner moves for a stay of arbitration.

*1010A contract executed by petitioner and respondents on June 5, 1969 provided for various terms and conditions of employment. In dispute is the provision for “ teacher load ”. It states that “ in order to promote an optimum learning and teaching environment, the Board of Education shall make every effort to maintain the 1968-1969 teacher specialist-pupil ratio.” For the fiscal year 1969-1970, the teacher specialist-pupil ratio was increased by the elimination of dental hygienists and by the reduction of the number of nurse teachers, both of whom come…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Chautauqua Central School Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Board of Education v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Ladany v. William Morrow & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  4. In re Arbitration between the Board of Education & Auburn TeachersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Belmont Central School District v. Belmont Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API