Legal Opinion

State v. T. T. (In re T. T.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 15, 2018No. A162399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P. J.

*377Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In her only assignment of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that she was a danger to others. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). We conclude that the evidence in the record is legally sufficient to support that determination; accordingly, we affirm.

Appellant asks us to take de novo review of a particular factual finding of the trial court. However, we decline to exercise our discretion to do so. See ORS 19.415(3)(b)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. PierettiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. J. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. S. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. S. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. Z. W. Y. (A167562)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API