State v. T. T. (In re T. T.)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P. J.
*377Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In her only assignment of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that she was a danger to others. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). We conclude that the evidence in the record is legally sufficient to support that determination; accordingly, we affirm.
Appellant asks us to take de novo review of a particular factual finding of the trial court. However, we decline to exercise our discretion to do so. See ORS 19.415(3)(b)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. PierettiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. J. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. S. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. S. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. Z. W. Y. (A167562)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019