Legal Opinion

Bailey v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1971No. A-16069PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRETT, Judge:

Plaintiff in Error, Jack Edward Bailey, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa, Case No. 107889, for the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under influence of intoxicating liquor, with punishment fixed at a fine of $75.00, 10 days in the city jail, and court costs. 1 Judgment and sentence was imposed on April 15, 1970, and this appeal perfected therefrom.

The conviction is based on a stipulation of facts. On November 27, 1969, while driving an automobile on a public street in the City of Tulsa, defendant ran into the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Walton v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  4. Blydenburg v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Robertson v. State Ex Rel. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. State v. HitchensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Turner v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. State v. RichersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API