Legal Opinion
San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stevinson
California Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1917No. Sac. No. 2309PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff filed a pleading entitled “Complaint to Review Judgment,” to which defendant successfully demurred. From the judgment following the order sustaining the demurrer this appeal is taken.
The complaint set forth in substance the following alleged facts:
Plaintiff was incorporated in Nevada in 1905 and has ever since that time been doing business in California. Defend ant was incorporated in this state in 1903 and has ever since been transacting business in California.
In 1871 there was incorporated The San Joaquin and Kings River Canal and Irrigation Company (plaintiff’s predecessor in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. Gabrielle Brockenbrough, John Harvie, Edwin Harvie, Jacqueline Harvie, Julia Ann Harvie, Heirs at Law, and Devisees of John HarvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- People ex rel. Teschemacher v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Allen v. CurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Butler v. VassaultCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Buckelew v. ChipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Carp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Brady v. FrengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Walls v. System Freight ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949