Legal Opinion

Carp v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1926No. Docket No. 3089PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an original application, made upon notice given by petitioner to respondents, for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent Court to enter a final decree of divorce in an action prosecuted by the petitioner against his wife, Hilma Carp.

The wife did not appear in that action and an interlocutory decree of divorce was entered in favor of the husband on the fifteenth day of February, 1923. The wife did not appeal or move for a new trial. Within due time she moved the Court to set aside the interlocutory decree “on the ground of accident, surprise, excusable neglect, and that no service…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Olson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Lane v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Babcock v. BabcockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Foy v. FoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API