Legal Opinion
United States v. Nelson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 6, 2006No. 06-6071PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Alton Ray Nelson Jr. has filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15 to amend and supplement his previously denied motion for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because the motion must be treated as a successive motion for relief under § 2255, we vacate the district court’s order for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, construe Mr. Nelson’s notice of appeal and appellate briefs as an implied application for authorization to file another § 2255 motion, and deny authorization.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Nelson pleaded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Allender v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Monroe Johnson III v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Tool Box, Inc. v. Ogden City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- In Re ClineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Ezell Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Derrek ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BuenrostroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ochoa v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.