Legal Opinion
In Re Cline
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 9, 2008No. 08-3113PublishedCited by 481 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Timothy Jay Cline, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, has filed a motion for remand challenging the transfer to this court of a post-conviction motion he filed in district court seeking dismissal of his indictment. We conclude that the district court correctly ruled that the claims in his motion constituted second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims, for which circuit court authorization is required in order to be filed. We deny the motion for remand, dismiss the matter, and warn Mr. Cline that further unauthorized filings may subject him to sanctions.
Mr. Cline was convicted of…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by481 opinions
- Abernathy v. WandesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re RainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Stanko v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- In Re LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
476 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.