Legal Opinion
State v. Parra
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1978No. 4164PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County which affirmed a judgment of the Phoenix City Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer only one question on appeal: Does A.R.S. § 28-446(A)(8), which authorizes the ex parte, discretionary suspension of a driver’s license for one previous conviction of driving while intoxicated, violate procedural due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment if the suspension occurred prior to a hearing?
The facts necessary for a determination of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. Super. Ct. in & for Cty. of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- O'Hara v. Superior Ct. of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Barrett v. ThorneycroftArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Pearson v. MOTOR VEH., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. ParraArizona Supreme Court · 1978