Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Thorneycroft

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1978No. 13579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Appellant Thomas William Barrett refused to take the “breathalyzer” test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood after he was arrested for being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The arresting officer notified the Arizona Highway Department, Drivers License Service, of appellant's arrest and refusal to take the breath test. Upon the basis of the affidavit presented by the officer, the State Motor Vehicle Department suspended the driver’s license of appellant for six months pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-691(D). A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re EmbertonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Campbell v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. ParraArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Application of HendrixCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sarwark v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Pearson v. MOTOR VEH., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Potter v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API