Legal Opinion

Scott v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 24, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the lumbosacral region of the plaintiffs spine did not constitute a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Rodriguez v Huerfano, 46 AD3d 794, 795 [2007]) and, in any event,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Jilani v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Rodriguez v. HuerfanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Williams v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API