Legal Opinion
Williams v. Town of Greenburgh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, through competent medical evidence, that the plaintiffs condition did not result from the subject accident (see Scott v Martinez, 99 AD3d 984 [2012]; Enyah v Sherpa, 98 AD3d 993 [2012]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The affidavit of the plaintiffs expert was conclusory on the issue of whether the plaintiffs condition was the result of the subject accident (see Barry v Future Cab Corp., 71 AD3d 710 [2010]; Piperis v Wan, 49 AD3d 840 [2008]).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Piperis v. WanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Barry v. Future Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Enyah v. SherpaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Scott v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kabir v. VanderhostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Alamin v. UddinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Alamin v. UddinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kabir v. VanderhostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013