Legal Opinion

Williams v. Town of Greenburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, through competent medical evidence, that the plaintiffs condition did not result from the subject accident (see Scott v Martinez, 99 AD3d 984 [2012]; Enyah v Sherpa, 98 AD3d 993 [2012]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The affidavit of the plaintiffs expert was conclusory on the issue of whether the plaintiffs condition was the result of the subject accident (see Barry v Future Cab Corp., 71 AD3d 710 [2010]; Piperis v Wan, 49 AD3d 840 [2008]).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Piperis v. WanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Barry v. Future Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Enyah v. SherpaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Scott v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API