Legal Opinion

State v. Weaver

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1986No. 8527SC737PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant assigns error to the admission of testimony by Carl Rutledge that he had bought “hot tools” from him on 29 October 1984 and that he had been buying tools from the defendant for the previous eight years. He argues that this evidence should have been excluded under G.S. 8C-1, Rule 404(b) which provides:

*246Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. CurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. PearcyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HamrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API