Legal Opinion

State v. Hamrick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1986No. 8627SC59PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant has brought forward nine assignments of error. We shall discuss two of them. He assigns error to the admission of testimony by Bill Wease and Billy Joe Hill that with the defendant they had broken into other places and stolen tractors. We believe this assignment of error has merit.

The State offered evidence of the defendant’s involvement in other crimes to prove the crime for which the defendant was being tried. The State contends that in this case the evidence was properly admitted to prove intent or design and a plan to commit the crime charged. G.S. 8C-1, Rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API