Farish v. Cieneguita Copper Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. While fraud is a question of fact that must he proven hy the party charging it, the evidence submitted on the trial of the case was amply sufficient to sustain the charge.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. While fraud is a question of fact that must he proven hy the party charging it, the evidence submitted on the trial of the case was amply sufficient to sustain the charge. If promises under which plaintiff was induced to vote for resolution exchanging stock were made fraudulently, plaintiff should be relieved from the consequences of his acts, and should be relieved from complying with his part of the transaction when he…
1Opinion of the Court
NAVE, J. —
This is an action brought by the appellants to set aside a reorganization of the Cieneguita Copper Company, a solvent, going corporation organized under the laws of this territory, into the Cieneguita Copper Company, a corporation organized for the purpose under the laws of the state of Nevada, with the same capitalization as the Arizona corporation, pursuant to which all of the assets of the Arizona corporation were conveyed to the Nevada corporation, under an agreement that the Nevada corporation should assume the debts of the Arizona corporation, and that the stock of the Arizona…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Mason v. Pewabic Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
- Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- McKee v. Home Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gow v. Consolidated Coppermines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Kosman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Morton v. Pacific Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
- McClean v. BradleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.