Legal Opinion
Nasseri v. Geico General Insurance
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 15, 2005No. 60, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.
We issued a writ of certiorari in this case for the purpose of resolving two important coverage issues under the Motor Vehicle Insurance subtitle of the Insurance Code, Maryland Code (1996, 2002 Repl.Vol., 2005 Supp.), §§ 19-501 through 19-516 of the Insurance Article.
The first issue arises because, inter alia, § 19 — 501 (b)(2)(ii) of the Insurance Code excludes a “taxicab” from the definition of “motor vehicle.” 1 The petitioner Ebrahim Nasseri drives a taxicab and is also the owner of a personal motor vehicle insured by the respondent GEICO General Insurance Company. The question presented…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Board of County Commissioners v. StephansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Salamon v. Progressive Classic InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Opert v. Criminal Injuries Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- BAA, PLC v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Government Employees Insurance v. ComerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Maryland Insurance Administration v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.