Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Eddy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1933No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 37,241PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWibst, J.

The parties to this suit were divorced in June, 1929. The decree followed an agreement of the parties and ordered defendant to assign to plaintiff a policy of insurance and pay her $105 per month as long as she remained unmarried, and recited the provision to be in lieu of dower. Defendant was and is now an officer in the U. S. army, has remarried, has a wife and baby to support, and, in October, 1932, he filed a petition to have the monthly allowance reduced on account of his inability to pay by reason of reduction in salary,;., new family obligations, and debts. The court reduced the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Camp v. CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Aldrich v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Skinner v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Davis v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Warrington v. WarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mark v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Butler v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Lilley v. LilleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API