Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Skinner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 21PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Genesee; Collingwood, J., presiding. Petition by Aurah W. Skinner against William D. Skinner for the enforcement of the terms of a decree of divorce respecting alimony. Defendant filed a cross-petition asking for a modification of said decree. From a decree denying the cross-petition, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case is here upon appeal by the defendant from an order of the court below, denying the petition of the defendant for a modification of a decree for the payment of alimony. On September 30, 1911, the plaintiff obtained a decree of absolute divorce from the defendant upon the ground of extreme cruelty. The parties never had any children. The record discloses that on August 10, 1911, a property settlement was entered into by the parties, in writing, which agreement was approved by the court, and the terms thereof were incorporated in the decree *245made and entered in the ease. By the terms of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Camp v. CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Aldrich v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Meyers v. MeyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Gittings v. GittingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kunker v. KunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Lewis v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Worthington v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API