Legal Opinion

Foss v. National Marine Fisheries Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1998No. 97-36097PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This case calls upon us to decide whether an applicant for a federal fishing quota permit has a cognizable procedural due process claim. Appellant Richard Foss filed his application 45 days late and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) denied the application as untimely. Foss claims that the denial violated his procedural due process rights and also challenges the denial on other grounds. The district court held that Foss had no property or liberty interest in the permit and hence did not have a due process claim, rejected his other claims, and granted summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. AraveDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1998
  2. The Fishing Company of Alaska v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002
  3. Foss v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Johnson v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Zhang v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API