Legal Opinion
The Fishing Company of Alaska v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 5, 2002No. C97-126ZPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ZILLY, District Judge.
This action involves judicial review of regulations promulgated and civil penalties assessed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA” or “Agency”). This matter comes before the Court on the following motions: Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, docket no. 44; defendants’ motion for summary judgment, docket no. 50; plaintiffs’ motion to strike, docket no. 57; and plaintiffs’ motion for leave to offer extra-record evidence, docket no. 59. The parties have agreed that this matter may be decided on these motions and without trial. While the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hadaja, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2003
- Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Roche v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Favretto v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2002
- Fishing Company Of Alaska, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.