Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Bank of Dawson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1935No. 23076PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

This was a suit on a note. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and the'defendant’s mother for a new trial being overruled he excepted. The note was in regular form, being for a valuable consideration, in the principal sum of $1500, payable to A. F. Hopkins or bearer, signed by W. F. Ferguson and indorsed on the back, A. F. Hopkins. The defendant’s plea denied (1) that he was indebted, (2) that the indorsement on the contract aforesaid was genuine and legal, (3) that the plaintiff was a bona fide holder for value in due course without notice of the contract sued upon, (4) that the note…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fouche & Fouche v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hillyer v. BrogdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Southern Exchange Bank v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Parr v. EricksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Hager v. National German-American BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monitronics International, Inc. v. VeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Ferguson v. Bank of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Ferguson v. Bank of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API