Legal Opinion

Parr v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 18, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Calhoun. City court of Atlanta. November 30, 1901.

1Opinion of the Court

1. A bona fide holder of a negotiable promissory note, purchased for value and before maturity, is protected against a defense that the note was without consideration.

2. Where a negotiable note payable at a future date was indorsed by the payee to the plaintiff, in the absence of proof to the contrary the law will presume that the plaintiff took before maturity, for value and without notice. Hatcher v. Bank, 79 Ga. 542; Walters v. Palmer, 110 Ga. 776.

3. Where, in defense to a suit upon a note, the defendant pleads that the plaintiff purchased after maturity, and there is no evidence to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hatcher & Co. v. National Bank of ChambersburgSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Walters v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baskins v. Valdosta Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Heard v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Simmons v. CouncilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Butler v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Citizens Bank v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API