Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Bank of Dawson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 27, 1936No. 25193PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The Bank of Dawson, as holder in due course, brought suit on a promissory note against Ferguson. The defendant filed his verified plea and answer setting up that he was not indebted on the note; that the indorsement of the payee thereon was not genuine; that the bank was not a bona fide holder in due course, for value and without notice, of the contract sued on; that the note was wholly without consideration, and the defendant received nothing from the original payee, and was and is due him no sum whatever; and that the note was given to the payee as payment for 100 shares of the stock of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Central Railroad v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Temples v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Georgia Railroad v. ColeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Haney School Furniture Co. v. Hightower Baptist InstituteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. Thurmond v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HALL COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Patterson Bank v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Patterson Bank v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API