Legal Opinion
Brady v. Dunlop Tire Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 3, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Spain, J.
Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Relihan, Jr., J.), entered April 8, 1999 in Tioga County, which, inter alia, granted motions by defendants Dunlop Tire Corporation and Bridgestone/Firestone for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them and partially granted a motion by defendant Armstrong Rim and Wheel Manufacturing Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.
Plaintiff Thomas Brady, Jr. (hereinafter plaintiff) sustained serious injuries while replacing the tube in the tire of a manure spreader at the farm where he was employed.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Merritt v. Raven Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Village of Groton v. Tokheim Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Steinbarth v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lara v. Delta International Machinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Burke v. Spartanics Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Stalker v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Oliver v. Tanning Bed, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Wick v. WABASH HOLDING CORP.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.