Legal Opinion

In re Castro

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1960No. 4175; No. 4176PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*456These two cases, being designated below respectively as Juvenile No. 5442 and Juvenile Nos. 5303, 5465, 5466, 5467 and 5468, came before this Court by way of appeals from the orders of the judge of the juvenile court consenting to the trial of the juvenile parties as adults in criminal proceedings. The cases were joined on appeal for purposes of briefing and argument, inasmuch as, except for Gilbert Chang, who was named a party in only Juvenile No. 5442 (No. 4175 in this Court), the juvenile parties are identical in both cases; the cases all stem from sexual acts; all the charges here…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Tilton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Mogis v. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  4. State v. Van BurenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Treloar v. Swinerton and Walberg Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. Dillingham Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Chen v. HoeflingerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API