Treloar v. Swinerton and Walberg Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
NAKAMURA, J.
The question in the case before us on a grant of certiorari is whether the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (the Appeals Board) erred when it affirmed the decision of the Director of Labor and Industrial Relations (the Director) allowing the workers’ compensation claim of Claimant-appellee Albert Treloar (Treloar or the claimant) to be reopened pursuant to HRS § 386-89(c). The Intermediate Court of Appeals reversed the Appeals Board, holding that the last sentence of § 386-89(c) prevents the reopening of a claim after an award of periodic benefit…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Keliipuleole v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Amantiad v. OdumHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Department of Budget & FinanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Brown v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.