Legal Opinion · Dissent

Furlong Development Co. v. Georgetown-Scott County Planning & Zoning Commission

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2016No. 2014-SC-000594-DGPublished

1DissentWright, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority. Forcing developer to forfeit the bonds in this case amounts to punitive damages, which are not allowed in Kentucky contract law. At the outset, I point out that the lower courts failed to consider the issue of damages and whether they were punitive (and, therefore, prohibited by statute). Understandably, the majority’s opinion does not consider the issue because the parties failed to raise or argue it.

I. BACKGROUND

Developer obtained property in Scott County and began plans for a subdivision. It applied to the Georgetown-Scott County Planning and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Works (Thomas) Inc. v. Hazard Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  4. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ADT Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  5. Patel v. Tuttle Properties, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API