Legal Opinion
DAVID JASON WEST AND PYDIA, INC. v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided July 21, 2006No. 03-05-00724-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal, we must determine whether the district court abused its discretion by granting the State’s request for a supplemental temporary injunction and asset freeze against appellants, David West and Pydia, Inc. d/b/a wivw.bankopp.com (collectively “West”). In three issues, West asserts that the district court erred by granting the temporary injunction because the State did not demonstrate (1) a probable right to recovery or (2) a probable injury, and (3) the order did not specifically state the reasons for its issuance. Because we hold that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- State v. Texas Pet Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sonwalkar v. St. Luke's Sugar Land Partnership, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Marauder Corp. v. Beall, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- 8100 NORTH FREEWAY LTD. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Cook v. Tom Brown MinistriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- City of Corpus Christi v. Friends of the Coliseum, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.