Legal Opinion
Marauder Corp. v. Beall
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided January 13, 2010No. 05-08-00713-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By Chief Justice WRIGHT.
Marauder Corporation appeals from a judgment awarding damages and injunc-tive relief. In nine issues, Marauder contends generally the trial court erred in: (1) granting the injunction because Beall did not meet the requirements for an injunction; (2) awarding statutory damages in the absence of actual damages; (3) awarding attorney’s fees because Beall failed to i-ecover actual damages; (4) awarding additional attorney’s fees for appeal not awarded by the jury; and (5) imposing the wrong post-judgment interest rate. We sustain Marauder’s fifth issue to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. Mega Child Care, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- McCaig Ex Rel. Estate of McCaig v. Wells Fargo Bank (Texas), N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Uptegraph v. Sandalwood Civic Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Sonwalkar v. St. Luke's Sugar Land Partnership, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Webb v. VOGA, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Vanderbilt Mtge and Fin, Inc. v. Cesar Flores, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.