Legal Opinion

Weir v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1964No. 5-3253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGteorge Rose Smith, J.

This appears to he an action brought by the appellee to recover judgment upon six promissory notes executed by the appellant. We do not reach the merits, for under Rule 9 we are compelled to affirm the the judgment. The appellant has submitted only a statement of the case, a list of the points relied upon for reversal, and a brief. There is no abstract of the pleadings, the judgment, or the testimony that was heard below. To determine the facts in the case we should have to explore the record, which is contrary to our practice. Vire v. Vire, 236 Ark. 740, 368 S. W. 2d 265.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vire v. VireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hurley v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Reliable Finance Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Kelley v. Southern Pulpwood Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Dickson v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Love v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966