Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Lam
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
This appeal requires us to apply the principles set forth by the Supreme Court of Georgia in OB-GYN Assoc. v. Littleton, 259 Ga. 663 (386 SE2d 146) (1989) (Littleton II), and reaffirmed in OB-GYN Assoc. v. Littleton, 261 Ga. 664 (410 SE2d 121) (1991) (Littleton IV), regarding the recoverability of damages for mental injury or emotional distress under the so-called “impact rule.” Applying those principles to the facts of this case, we conclude that a possibility of recovery exists under the claim presented by Lam, and the trial court therefore did not err in denying…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- OB-Gyn Associates of Albany v. LittletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Lee v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Holmes v. WortheyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Kuhr Bros., Inc. v. SpahosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Holbrook v. StansellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Grizzle v. NorsworthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Kirkland v. Earth Fare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Bruscato v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Shores v. Modern Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.