Legal Opinion

Grizzle v. Norsworthy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 26, 2008No. A08A0421PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

James R. Grizzle appeals the summary judgment against him on his claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The ruling was based upon the trial court’s determination that Grizzle had failed to make requisite showings under the impact rule and the pecuniáry loss rule. The record shows that the trial court erred with respect to the impact rule. Thus, although the record shows no error with respect to the pecuniary loss rule, we must reverse the grant of summary judgment.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Lee v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Thompson v. EzorSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Holbrook v. StansellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kenneth S. Nugent v. Alexandra C. MylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. Bullington v. Blakely Crop Hail, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Fennelly v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. CONTOUR SIERRA, LLC v. COLETTE WILLIAMSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API