Legal Opinion

Kuhr Bros., Inc. v. Spahos

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1954No. 34796, 34797, 34811PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

The action is one ex delicto and not one ex contractu. While the plaintiff sets out in his petition a copy of the sales agreement between himself and the defendant Altman, which contained the agreement as to the installation of the furnace, he does not predicate his action on a breach of a contract provision or of an express duty undertaken by Altman under the contract. The contract was alleged to show that the plaintiff and Altman stood in the relationship of vendor and vendee, and to show that Altman owed to the plaintiff the peculiar duties owed by a vendor to a vendee, and it is for the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Dunn v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Atlanta Hub Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Holland Furnace Co. v. NauracajIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. OB-Gyn Associates of Albany v. LittletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Hamilton v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Holmes v. WortheyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Beam v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Leigh v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API