Wilson v. Glastic Corporation
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Colleen Conway Cooney, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Reginald Wilson appeals the trial court’s granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Glastic Corporation. Wilson argues that he did not have to exhaust his contractual remedies prior to pursuing a retaliation claim pursuant to R.C. 4123.90. We find no merit to the appeal and affirm.
{¶ 2} A review of the record indicates the following facts.
{¶ 3} The employees of Glastic Corporation are governed by a collective bargaining agreement, which provides the terms and conditions of employment at Glastic Corporation. The collective…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haynes v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Beatty v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Mencer v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Monique Burgess v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026