Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Glastic Corporation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2002No. 80840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colleen Conway Cooney, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Reginald Wilson appeals the trial court’s granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Glastic Corporation. Wilson argues that he did not have to exhaust his contractual remedies prior to pursuing a retaliation claim pursuant to R.C. 4123.90. We find no merit to the appeal and affirm.

{¶ 2} A review of the record indicates the following facts.

{¶ 3} The employees of Glastic Corporation are governed by a collective bargaining agreement, which provides the terms and conditions of employment at Glastic Corporation. The collective…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Beatty v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  3. Mencer v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. Monique Burgess v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API