Legal Opinion
Monique Burgess v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 6, 2026No. 1:24-cv-01217Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MONIQUE BURGESS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01217-PAB Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant. Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority’s (“GCRTA”) Motion to Dismiss (the “Second Motion to Dismiss”). (Doc. No. 21.) Plaintiff Monique Burgess (“Burgess”) filed an Opposition to the Second Motion to Dismiss on March 19, 2026, to which GCRTA replied on May 11, 2026. (Doc. Nos. 23, 27.) Also…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.