Legal Opinion

Rautsaw v. Clark

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1985No. CA84-06-019PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Eaton Municipal Court of Preble County.

Appellant, Gladys Rautsaw, and ap-pellee, Hubert Clark, are landowners. Washington Township Trustees apportioned responsibility for constructing and maintaining a partition fence between the adjacent properties by allocating the northern half of the fence to Clark, and the southern half to Raut-saw.

During construction of her portion of the fence line, appellant removed some hedge trees which had grown from Clark’s property into the existing partition fence. Rautsaw hired appellee Robert Rich to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Antonik v. ChamberlainOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. CapolinoOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Banford v. Aldrich Chem. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jones v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Crawford v. National Lead Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
  5. Blevins v. SorrellOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API