Legal Opinion

Louis James Adams v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2016No. ED102887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge

Introduction

Appellant • Louis James Adams (“Adams”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The record before us suggests that Adams’s amended motion for post-conviction relief was untimely filed. Because the motion court did not make an independent inquiry into whether Adams was abandoned by post-conviction counsel as a result of the untimely filing, we áre compelled by the Supreme Court’s holding in Moore v. State to reverse the motion court’s judgment and remand the case to the motion court to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  2. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. John Childers v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Loudermilk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Wooldridge v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Melvin Huffman v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Edwards v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Heller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Tousaint E. Richard v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Anthony Wallace v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API