Legal Opinion

Edwards v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1918No. 10067PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment for larceny of cotton; from Grady superior court— Judge Harrell. August 7, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled. The crime charged was designated in the indictment as “simple larceny, a felony.” The criminal act charged in the indictment was the larceny of a bale of cotton. “The name given to it, in the bill of indictment, does not characterize the offense; the description characterizes it.” O’Halloran v. State, 31 Ga. 206; Camp v. State, 3 Ga. 417 (2); Sneed v. State, 16 Ga. App. 351 (85 S. E. 354); Lummus v. State, 17 Ga. App. 414 (87 S. E. 147).

2. The grounds of the amendment to the motion show no error, the evidence is sufficient to support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. O'Halloran v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  3. Lummus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Sneed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  2. Brusnighan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Hughes v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Edwards v. McNair & SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API