Legal Opinion

Brusnighan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1952No. 34013, 34014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

The true character of a criminal accusation or indictment is not fixed by. the denomination of the crime given it by the pleader, but by its allegations; that is to say, the name given the crime which is charged in the accusation or indictment does not characterize the offense, but the nature of the crime charged is to be determined from the description of the crime, that is, from the acts alleged to have been committed which are contrary to the laws of the State. Camp v. State, 3 Ga. 417, 419; O’Halloran v. State, 31 Ga. 206 (1), 208; Aiken v. State, 90 Ga. 452 (16 S. E. 206); Disharoon v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. York v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Lipham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Disharoon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Wells v. HandDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1965
  3. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Plummer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Wiley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API