Perkins v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
An indictment for forgery was demurred to on the grounds (a) that it is insufficient in law, “ in that said indictment sets out that said note is a genuine note of the man who executed same, and sets out no material allegation that the alteration claimed to have been made would cause any loss to the drawer of said note;” and (b) “that said indictment fails to set out that the. alterations of said note as alleged would cause any loss or did cause any loss to the drawer of said note.” In Barron v. State, 12 Ga. App. 342 (1-e) (77 S. E. 214), this court held that “ in a prosecution for forgery…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bowen v. Smith-Hall Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Southern Express Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Meredith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.