Legal Opinion
Jane Doe v. Osseo Area Sch. Dist.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 31, 2017No. Civil No. 17–1223 ADM/DTSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 14, 2017, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendant Osseo Area School District, ISD No. 279's ("Osseo" or the "School District") Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 17], and Plaintiffs Jane Doe, John Doe, and Minor Doe, by and through his Legal Guardians, Jane Doe and John Doe's (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 33]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs' Motion is denied and Defendant's Motion is granted.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Graffiti Discovered on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,525 Juan Jaurequi v. Carter Manufacturing Co., Inc., John Deere Company Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023