Legal Opinion
A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 1, 2023No. 0:21-cv-01760Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA A.J.T., by and through her parents, A.T. and G.T., individually and jointly, Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND ORDER Civil File No. 21-1760 (MJD/DTS) Filed Under Seal OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 279, and OSSEO SCHOOL BOARD, Defendants. Amy J. Goetz, School Law Center, LLC, Counsel for Plaintiffs. Christian R. Shafer, Elizabeth M. Meske, Laura Tubbs Booth, and Timothy A. Sullivan, Ratwik, Roszak & Maloney, PA, Counsel for Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff AJT is a teenage girl with a severe form of epilepsy…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant, Defendants/third-Party v. Frederick Stokley, Superintendent John Campion, Director of Special Programs Charles Abate, Principal William Ward, Principal Lorraine Zak, Psychologist Kathleen McNally Social Worker Caroline Janover, Ldt-C George Neville, Principal Henry Hogue, Psychologist June Ann Dibb, Dr., Psychiatrist Joan Christian, Ldt-C Susan Lynaugh, Psychologist, Third-Party N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an InfantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.