Legal Opinion
Gold Kist, Inc. v. Mullinax
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided December 2, 1994No. AV93000435PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is a workmen's compensation case.1
Juanita Mullinax filed a complaint in October 1990, alleging that on July 20, 1990, she was injured in the course of her employment with Gold Kist, Inc. She alleged that as she was walking back to her work station, she slipped into an uncovered drain and injured her right leg. Gold Kist answered, admitting that Mullinax had suffered an accident on the job, but denying the nature and extent of the injury and the alleged disability.
Following ore tenus proceedings, the trial court entered an order finding, inter alia, that Mullinax had suffered a loss of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Gotlieb v. CollatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Blue Circle, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- INTERNATIONAL REHAB. ASSOCIATES v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hedgemon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Shop-A-Snak Food Mart, Inc. v. PenhaleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS WKRS. COMPEN. SELF INS. FUND v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- VI Prewett & Son, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Easley v. HUNTSVILLE-MADISON CTY. PUBLIC LIBRARYCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.