Legal Opinion
Shop-A-Snak Food Mart, Inc. v. Penhale
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided February 28, 1997No. 2951416PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Leota Penhale sued her employer, Shop-A-Snak Food Mart, Inc., to recover workmen's compensation benefits she claims she was owed for injuries she received in an on-the-job accident on August 30, 1991. She sustained a second, unrelated on-the-job accident on June 7, 1992. She agreed to a settlement of her workers' compensation benefits in that case, and the trial court approved the settlement.
A hearing was held in Penhale's lawsuit seeking benefits for her first injury. After receiving ore tenus evidence, the trial court determined that Penhale was permanently and totally disabled as a result…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Boshell v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Bogle v. ScheerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Pardue v. PotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Parte Publix Super Markets, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Carr v. ADDED DIMENSIONS NO. 72 BROOKWOODCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte Sunbelt Transport, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Ex Parte Steve Cagle Trucking Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- McLeod v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.