Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Veazey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 24, 1993No. 1920586PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Roosevelt Roberts, appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals from a judgment awarding him workers' compensation benefits for a partial disability. Roberts argued that the trial court erred because, he said, he had been entitled to a judgment against his employer, the defendant, Larry Veazey, based on a finding of total disability. The Court of Civil Appeals agreed and reversed the judgment of the trial court, 637 So.2d 1345. Veazey petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari, which was issued. The issue on our review is whether the Court of Civil Appeals afforded the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Roberts v. VeazeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. SteppCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Mayfield Trucking Co. v. NapierCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Kewish v. Alabama Home Builders Self Insurers FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Webb Oil Co., Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API