Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Adams

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2010No. 20090383Published

1DissentKapsner, Justice

[¶ 21] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 22] We recognized the potential for abuse by an officer with the authority to search pursuant to probation conditions in State v. Krous, 2004 ND 136, ¶ 21, 681 N.W.2d 822. We stated, “[a]ny search conducted under a condition of probation must be conducted in a reasonable manner. U.S. Const. Amend. IV. The terms of the condition do not authorize searches conducted in an unreasonable manner.” Id. The safe in this case was destroyed and is now unusable, yet the majority holds this manner of search was reasonable. I disagree.

[¶ 23] The majority cites State v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. Flores-MontanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API