Motor Terminals, Inc. v. National Car Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
This is a derivative stockholder’s suit instituted iby the plaintiff as the holder of one-half of the stock of another corporation, the defendant National Fitch Corporation, for a declaratory judgment with respect to the meaning of certain provisions in a contract entered into by the latter and still a third corporation — the defendant National Car Company. Federal jurisdiction rests upon diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy.
The suit is peculiar in that the plaintiff is a corporation, rather than an individual. But this feature, although perhaps novel, is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Korvettes, Inc. And Galaries Anspach (New York) Inc., Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. David B. Brous, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Universal Fiberglass Corp., Henry J. Rand, Iii, George H. Bookbinder, and James R. Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Empire Box Corp. v. Willard Sulzberger Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.