Legal Opinion

Mott v. Stanlake

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1975No. Docket 22241PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.

Plaintiffs own a lot in St. Clair County that fronts Lake Huron. A recent title search revealed that a warranty deed dated December 7, 1937 conveyed to plaintiffs’ predecessor in title "Lot 6 except * * * and also reserving the East 100 feet of said lot which is reserved and dedicated to the use of the lot owners of this subdivision”. Plaintiffs brought suit in 1974 to quiet title, seeking to have the reserving language declared ineffectual.

The trial court found for defendants. The effect of the court’s ruling is to give the right to use 100 feet of plaintiff’s beach to the owners of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Choals v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bolan v. Avalon Farms Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Michael J. Uhes, Ph.D., P.C., Profit Sharing Plan & Trust v. BlakeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Miller & Smith, Inc. v. ThompsonFairfax County Circuit Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API