Legal Opinion

Miller & Smith, Inc. v. Thompson

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided October 16, 1986No. Case No. (Chancery) 97549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE THOMAS A. FORTKORT

The case before us involves the plaintiffs* Motion for Summary Judgment. The facts necessary to understand the Plaintiffs* Motion are recited herein.

Miller and Smith, Inc., contracted with Lucy B. Thompson to buy 5.0130 acres of land for $521,352. Other provisions in the contract of sale provided for higher payments to Mrs. Thompson if higher land usage was obtained through the rezoning process.

Mrs. Thompson received a deed to the land many years ago. In that deed the grantor attempted to place a right of first refusal in favor of Mrs. Thompson’s children.

After…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Fogg v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Foster v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  4. Allen v. GreenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Board of Supervisors v. Ecology One., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Costello v. Frederick County Sanitation AuthorityFrederick County Circuit Court · 1999
  2. Garraghty v. FrenchRichmond County Circuit Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API